SLEEVING VS. NON SLEEVED BLOCK
09-28-2005 | 01:28 AM
#11
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,656
09-28-2005 | 07:03 AM
#12
3.0 BAR
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,058
Re: SLEEVING VS. NON SLEEVED BLOCK
Originally Posted by turbohf
---- sleeving a block. jeff evans said he's had more sleeved blocks fail on him than he has stock blocks 
09-28-2005 | 05:18 PM
#13
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,656
Re: SLEEVING VS. NON SLEEVED BLOCK
Originally Posted by projekteg
Originally Posted by turbohf
---- sleeving a block. jeff evans said he's had more sleeved blocks fail on him than he has stock blocks
10-02-2005 | 01:23 PM
#18
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,656
Re: SLEEVING VS. NON SLEEVED BLOCK
Originally Posted by 98ctr
shiet, I made 500 whp on pump gas with stock sleaves. that alone alowed me to run a 10.7 sec 1/4 mile.
pump gas is the ----! but i will probly play it safe with 500whp on race gas...
10-03-2005 | 08:37 PM
#19
0.5 BAR
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 141
Re: SLEEVING VS. NON SLEEVED BLOCK
Originally Posted by redhondacivic69
In the recent issue of D-Sport Mag they ran 18 psi on a completely stock B16, everything held until a ringland let loose on a piston. You replaced the pistons so you should be fine at 15 on the track IF you tune it correctly.
that was with 114 octane race gas on a closed room engine dyno, no where near everyday track conditions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2stockrocketz
Hybrid/Tech
10
11-01-2005 08:08 PM
