Originally Posted by evosol

How do you know? Were you there? The only one who said the hunters shot first was the gook on trial. What he admitted to was that he was walking away, he took off his scope, apparently one shot was fired at him so he turned around spraying. And instead of leaving the scene for saftey and calling the cops he instead killed an unarmed man than chased down another man and shot him in the back.


bottom line is that he needed a defense for shooting unarmed people in the back so of course the defense is going to say they shot first and dumbasses like you believe it when in reality he was an offended gook who murdered people in cold blood. He obviously didn't feel as if he was the one in danger since he was the one who ran down the hunters to shoot them in the back.


I bet if this was a white hunter who admitted to killing 5 hmog, one of which was unarmed and the other he had to run down and shoot in the back you definitely wouldn't be defending him. Your just another tool blinded by the racecard and say "ohh its the media's fault he looks so bad."


I find this amusing. Since i already made it clear that no one knows for sure what happened. But you insist that you are so sure you know what happened. It would only be fair if i tell you what i think happened.

Vang is hunting by himself and is met by a group of hunters, The band of hunters tell him to leave while yelling derogetory names, Vang leaves the area, hes scared for his life because its obvious hes outnumbered. He does not know how many are armed, or what theyre intentions are. As he walks away, a member of the party takes a shot, whether it was meant as a warning shot or kill shot, it was enough to arouse emotions of imminent danger. I believe that since Vang came to the states fairly recently, he probably grew up in his homeland learning how to use weapons very effectively. Maybe even trained as most children are in those regions. So what did he do? He eliminated the threat, and make sure that each threat was disabled. The media called it "cold blooded killings," but in reality in the heat of the moment who is going to ask, "how many of you are armed?" Those where unknown factors to Vang and its obvious in the way he acted out. Its not "cold blooded killing" like it could easily be made to look. Serial killers and rapists are cold blooded killers. So to answer you ignorance with a little bit of my speculation. If them cracker-jacks where acting like cracker-jacks, then they probably fucked with the wrong gook on the wrong day, if they hadn't then 5 of their peoples would still be alive. As for Vang, well hes got to live the consequences.

lifes a bitch....

Originally Posted by hotrex

evo, your losing alot of respect with this thread man.

minorities gotta hang close though

---- the white man

Originally Posted by Stealthmode

The black activists really aren't helping their cause by taking on cases such as this. One day there could be a black guy who actually is innocent, or actually has made such a difference in peoples lives behind bars and could be granted clemency. Taking this joke of a case will really make people question when that other black guy comes up.